Revelio Labs x LinkUp: The Impact of Pay Transparency Laws
Pay transparency laws have become an increasingly popular tool to battle pay discrimination like the gender pay gap. Colorado implemented a policy requiring disclosure of salary ranges in job postings under the “Equal Pay for Equal Work” Act on January 1st, 2021.
Pay transparency laws have become an increasingly popular tool to battle pay discrimination like the gender pay gap. Colorado implemented a policy requiring disclosure of salary ranges in job postings under the “Equal Pay for Equal Work” Act on January 1st, 2021. Other places, notably New York City, whose pay transparency policy was to be enacted starting on May 15th, 2022 but was postponed to November following pushback from businesses, are following suit.
This week, Revelio Labs and LinkUp are working together to analyze the impact of Colorado’s pay transparency law using our joint data offering of company job listings, as well as workforce dynamics and employee sentiment. We wanted to know whether the policy increased transparency and whether it had any adverse effects.
First, we wanted to understand the extent of compliance with the policy. By comparing job postings in Colorado with other states (the ones without any pay transparency law), we see the share of posts with salary ranges jump up by 200% between December 2020 and January 2021, with steady increases afterward. In states without the policy, we also see a mild increase in salaries in postings, but nowhere near as high.
Salary ranges are only useful if they are narrow enough to provide salient information to an applicant, e.g. a salary range of 50-150k USD provides no useful information about the potential pay of a position whatsoever. To test the usefulness of salary ranges in Colorado post-pay transparency policy, we look at job postings with a salary range in Colorado, both before and after the policy was introduced. We argue postings that included salary ranges before it was required were intended to inform the applicant about the prospective salary. Their distribution tells us what informative salary ranges should look like. If the distribution of salary ranges after the law was in place is the same or smaller than before, we can conclude that post-policy salary ranges are informative. Below we plot the distribution of salary ranges, which are defined as the percent difference between floor and ceiling of the salary ranges.
We find that the average range after the policy is 33% (e.g. 60k-80k or 120k-150k USD), while before it was 39% (60-83k or 120-166k USD). Hence, salary ranges have become more informative since the policy went into effect.
Another question we had was whether companies would avoid posting jobs in Colorado if they feel that disclosing the salary range lowers their informational advantage and decreases bargaining power. By comparing changes in posting volumes in Colorado and other states compared to December 2020, we see that on average, employers have not been systematically avoiding posting jobs in Colorado.
That said, when we zoom in on roles, there are notable differences in the changes in job postings in Colorado compared to other states. In Colorado, 36 roles have seen a decrease in posting volumes, while only 11 roles have seen this decrease in other states.
The roles with the greatest relative decreases are tech-related roles like Software Engineers and IT Analysts. Software Engineers saw an 80 percentage point higher decrease in job postings after the policy was introduced, compared to other states.
Since some roles had large decreases in job postings in Colorado, we might expect to see increases in internal hiring to compensate for a lack of external talent. But this is not the case - Colorado has not increased its rate of internal mobility compared to before the policy was enacted. In fact, internal mobility in Colorado has grown less than in other states.
Lastly, while Colorado employees on average always had higher satisfaction rates with compensation and benefits, the new law also does not appear to have changed that. The policy, in conjunction with the pandemic, has decreased satisfaction compared to January 2021.
One reason for this may be that existing employees in Colorado see what new colleagues can make, or what they could be making, and become less satisfied with their own earnings. That said, it looks like the decrease is only transient, and on an upward trend again.
In conclusion, the policy reached its goal of increasing pay transparency, without major detrimental effects on labor demand in Colorado. The big open question remains: Does pay transparency actually help to achieve its real goal and decrease pay discrimination like gender pay gaps? While it is still a little early to tell, we will be sure to investigate!
- The pay transparency policy in Colorado has certainly offered more transparency, as job postings with salary ranges have increased 5-fold after the policy went into effect. Interestingly, the prevalence in other states has also increased.
- The majority of salary ranges in job postings are narrow enough to provide useful information.
- Despite fear that the policy could affect the volume of postings, there has been no impact on the average number of job postings when compared to other states. However, some roles, especially tech-focused roles, have seen large decreases in postings, suggesting that large tech firms have avoided posting these roles in Colorado.
- Companies in Colorado have not started hiring more talent internally. And, employee satisfaction with respect to benefits and compensation has taken as much of a pandemic-related dive in Colorado as in other states.